This piece first appeared in the money section of the Saga website on 4 February 2009
The text here may not be identical to the published text

Paul Lewis explains why he is sad that MPs are inquiring into pensioner poverty.

When I first worked for Age Concern back in 1973 there was much debate about poverty among pensioners. I did not understand why so much energy was spent on it. After all, I thought, ending poverty is simple. If people are poor you give them money. Then they are not poor any longer.

So, thirty six years later, I feel sad, rather than glad, that the Work and Pensions Select Committee has launched an inquiry into ‘Tackling Pensioner Poverty in Great Britain.’ Or rather I feel sad it has had to launch one.

Because no politician has gone to the polls in the nine general elections since 1973 on a platform of keeping pensioners poor. But once in power none of the four Labour and three Conservative administrations has done much to end it. Instead they have launched a patchwork of means-tested help and sticking plaster measures that have left large numbers of older people without an adequate income.

The Work and Pensions Select Committee wants submissions by 2 March. Bullet points, they say, and numbered paragraphs. Here’s mine.

This would be partly paid for by using the surplus on the National Insurance Fund. That raised nearly £5 billion more this year than was spent on benefits. And its surplus will total £52 billion at the end of this tax year. And if that isn’t enough borrow it. Like you did for the banks.

Thirty six years on ending pensioner poverty is still simple.


Go back to Saga Web

Go back to Saga Magazine

Go back to archive front page

Go back to Paul Lewis front page  


All material on these pages is © Paul Lewis 2009